Ryan McMullan has dedicated nearly 14 years of his professional time helping Toyota with sustainability initiatives, including chemicals management. Before Toyota, Ryan was a classmate of mine during our graduate studies at UC Santa Barbara's Bren School of Environmental Science and Management. He's now offering consulting services to help clients establish strategic sustainability leadership.
I recently caught up with him to discuss his aptitude for applying lean manufacturing principles to sustainability.
We understand that different groups often manage different aspects of sustainability. How can an organization determine which team (e.g. Sustainability, EHS, Product Design) is best suited to manage/own materials health/ emerging chemical issues? Or should there be a cooperative approach?
RM: During my time at Toyota, we tried several different approaches for managing emerging chemical issues.
So, even in a well-run company leading the charge with sustainability in their industry, there are still hurdles with chemical management?
RM: Right. And, ultimately, we tried to stop using the term “chemical management” because it meant so many diverse things to different people. We tried mapping out the various aspects of it and it quickly grew into a huge mind map of the different facets of impacts related to chemicals. Trying to adequately communicate which corner of chemical management we were talking about in any given conversation was always a challenge.
What do you see as the role of materials health within the circular economy?
RM: This was something that we discussed frequently on the board of the Zero Waste Business Association (now TRUE under GBCI). I see two crucial roles for chemical/materials management and its intersection with planning for a circular economy.
Can you share a few examples?
RM: Sure, I can easily think of three:
Of course, just as good chemicals management is good for the circular economy, so too is the circular economy good for chemicals management.
Can you explain what you mean by that?
RM: For materials like heavy metals that are difficult to recover once dispersed in the environment, an effective recovery program ensures that these materials are returned, properly handled, and hopefully recovered for the manufacturing process.
What inspires you to keep moving forward in corporate governance and sustainability?
RM: It has become clear that companies that manage their sustainability responsibilities well can become a powerful force for environmental progress. I was able to work for a company that is recognized as reinventing modern manufacturing through the Toyota Production System (lean manufacturing). So when Toyota took environmental responsibilities and sustainability seriously, there was a lot of credibility with other companies to follow suit. I always strived to learn more about lean manufacturing and incorporate the concepts into our environmental management and sustainability strategy.
Which lean manufacturing concepts are most applicable to sustainability?
RM: Most of them do in some way or another. A great example is Toyota's process of hoshin kanri (policy deployment). It was not initially an environmental process, but its methodical approach to governance, building consensus, building engagement, and moving forward on targets allowed a small group of sustainability experts to steer programs across a large company.
We knew that if we could be “a good example of a good example” that it could inspire other companies to do the same, multiplying the effect of our efforts. And that is exciting and that's what I'm currently sharing with organizations.
He earned his Masters from the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at UC Santa Barbara and his Bachelor's from Rice University. He keeps busy improving the sustainability of his home in Long Beach, California, teaching his 9-year-old son to conserve resources and design games, and writing on his experiences. He can be found at www.LeanGreenWay.com, on Twitter @LeanGreenRyan and LinkedIn (ryan-mcmullan).